Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 5,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 12:11 am
Then we donned white bibs and black velvet "togas" and soft caps, for a ceremony marking the university's 371st birthday, held in the Domkerk, the 13th C. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:58 am
A hearing isn't passage, but these are good bills that deserve support.Please, can we stop with the enhancments, now? [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
§43(c) has its own equity provision authorizing injunctions - but where is the irreparable harm? [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:08 am
Alex Rodriguez is not a "good fit" for the Stros, while Adam Everett is? [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:43 pm
Charney: S&C Waved Its Nazi Past [Gay City News] The Latest Charney Sensation [Leonard Link] [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:52 am
The refusal to give that information is a class "C" misdemeanor with a maximum penalty of a $500 fine. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
So far so good.' But I relish change, I really do. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
(b) trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character;(c) trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods". [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
The good faith exception would have saved the search anyway. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:49 am
They are* Case T-215/03 Sigla SA v OHIM, Elleni Holding BV: Elleni applied to register VIPS as a Community trade mark for various computer-y goods and services, including restaurants, in Classes 9, 35 and 42. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 11:41 am
Web search engines do a good job of bringing back relevant results from the entire web. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:58 am
My weekly Law Bytes column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) focuses on Bill C-47, the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act, which I think is better characterized as the Olympic Corporate Sponsor Protection Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 11:39 am
(Mark J.), the Court issued an important decision explicating the new DSO provision in section 522(c)(1). [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
Regular contributors often recommend posts by other bloggers that would be good to include in the next week's presentation. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:35 pm
First, “the district court erred by concluding that the CHEWY VUITON line of products was a protected parody without considering language in the statute that restricts use of the parody defense where defendant’s mark is used ‘as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services,’” citing 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
Merpel says, what's the betting that the judges had a jolly good time playing with the games, the better to familiarise themselves with the relevant subject-matter.Computer games addiction hereWriting a computer game hereWriting a book about computer games here [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:42 pm
Michael Arrington counters that this doesn't look so good for Google and that they are going to have to pay-up one way or another... [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
In the Stussy case, Case C-244/00 Van Doren + Q GmbH v Lifestyle + Sportswear Handelsgesellschaft mbH [2003] ETMR 75, 8 April 2003, the European Court of Justice was faced with a tricky problem involving burden of proof of consent to the marketing of goods where the trade mark owner said they hadn't been put on the market in the EEA by the trade mark owner or with its consent, while a retailer of the allegedly infringing goods said they had. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
REV. 793 (1998), with Michael C. [read post]
