Search for: "May v. May" Results 5781 - 5800 of 182,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 2:16 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Jean Christian Perfumes Ltd & Anor v Thakrar (t/a Brand Distributor or Brand Distributors Ltd) [2011] EWHC 1383 (Ch) (27 May 2011) Southern Counties Fresh Foods Ltd, Re [2011] EWHC 1370 (Ch) (01 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Barnes & Anor v Black Horse Ltd [2011] EWHC 1416 (QB) (31 May 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm by K&L Gates
By: Todd Reuter, K&L Gates, Spokane/Coeur D'Alene Spokane Structures, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 2:54 am by Michael DelSignore
The State however, further argues that officers are not required to advise suspects about the fifth right, relying on the Berghuis v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:56 am by Jeffrey Kron
Ledla Structural Development (Pty) Ltd and Others v Special Investigating Unit (CCT 319/21) [2023] ZACC 8 (10 March 2023) [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:04 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Microsoft falls behind Apple for first time in 20 years | The Guardian: - http://bit.ly/jo4RRtThe Devil likely died happy - http://is.gd/UeR4NiBin Laden Killed: The Nation Reacts | TPM Photo Galleries - http://goo.gl/gyaqHOsama bin Laden is dead, Obama says - http://goo.gl/KrHzAU.S. cables dissect Canada's leaders: WikiLeaks - http://goo.gl/qmD6FCongrats to Michael Fitzgibbon on 8 years of blogging at Thoughts From a Management Lawyer - http://bit.ly/jG15mtCanada Votes on Monday: Employee… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am by Marcel Pemsel
The judges referred to the CJEU decision in Parfums Christian Dior v Evora (C-337/95), which found that damage to the reputation of a trade mark can be a legitimate reason within the meaning of the provision. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
 As you may already know, in federal court you may cite to unpublished decisions (issued after 1/1/2007 - See FRAP 32.1)  but they have no precedential value. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:24 am by Jon
It is legislative restriction that may make the Ninth (not the First, which only restricts Congress) applicable, and that was not involved in this case. [read post]