Search for: "Million v State"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 24,661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
By 2021-2022, the province estimates a savings of $30 million annually, from which they intend to re-invest $6 million a year into other victim services, such as the Civil Remedies Grant Program. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Judge Trenga then applied the Mathews v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
Track municipal spending, the state's 160,000 contracts, billions in state payments and public authority data. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:30 pm
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Janus v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
(Plutarch, The Fall of the Roman Republic, Sulla, ¶ 31).In the West it has long been common for leaders of states (or those whose leadership guides the state) to establish proscription lists. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 2:06 am
Waterfront property is something that has attracted millions of residents to Florida over the years. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
In response to a 2014 decision from Oregon, Latif v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:06 pm
” Pearce v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Clark v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:50 am
(Alan observed that this position is inconsistent with the Seventh Circuit’s 2010 decision in Midwest Title Loans, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Landis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:33 am
This Kat is always thinking.On the 1709 blog, Ken Moon discussed the Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit's case of Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baca v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:17 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
See e.g., Haley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
The state high court also held in Pitzer College v. [read post]
