Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 72,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:18 am
It's another case in which Guam has attempted to run an election in which (essentially) only Chamorro people can vote. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
It holds that Oregon's prohibition on secretly recording communications between two people violate the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:42 pm
So while the majority is right that you can't dismiss the complaint here at the pleading stage, it's going to be a pain in the butt for everyone if people get to file suit in California claiming that they need accommodations at work because they allegedly get super sick when exposed to WiFi.(2) Experts are prostitutes. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 9:42 am
That's only slightly fewer than the number of people killed in recreational boating incidents, so it warrants the attention of motorists. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:36 pm
And people willing to make money off it. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 3:17 am
By now, most people are familiar with the concept of pre-nuptial agreements. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:38 am
People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Their position was analogous to that of the claimant in Burnip v Birmingham City Council, who herself required overnight care. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:55 pm
n People v Hunter (6/12/08) a unanimous Court of Appeals held that in a sex case, where the defense was consent, it was a Brady violation requiring reversal for the prosecutor to withhold from the defense information that in another pending case the same complainant has accused a man of rape and his claim was that the sex had been consensual. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 11:43 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:37 pm
In a landmark decision published last week, Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 11:33 am
People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Farkas (_NY_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01318 [2/22/11]), the Court of Appeals decided a very important 30.30 case - against the defendant- but in so ruling confirmed principles that will often help defendants seeking to move to dismiss a superseding accusatory on 30.30 grounds. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:40 am
By Lane V. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In the case of People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:37 pm
No, this was not the case people were waiting for. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm
Flood Control Dist. v. [read post]
