Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 6:49 am
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's contributory infringement claim for failure to state a claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
(¶40.)Plaintiffs’ connection to Plaintiffs’ ForumMr. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
Aug. 18, 2017), Louisiana Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld, rejecting the defendant’s request for the plaintiff’s social media data as “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence”, identified a level of social media data to be produced by the plaintiff that considered “weighing relevance and proportionality”. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:57 am
Philadelphia federal district court judge Harvey Bartle III has awarded $567.67 million in fees to plaintiff's lawyers in the gigantic fen-phen litigation, which has lasted nine years. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:24 pm
Sunday's New York Times had a long piece reviewing the battle (carried out through PR, lobbying, and election campaigns) between the United States Chamber of Commerce (and its Institute for Legal Reform) and plaintiffs' lawyers (represented by the American Association for Justice). [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 4:30 am
Acker Jr. of the Northern District of Alabama Friday asked federal prosecutors to charge prominent Mississippi plaintiff's attorney Richard Scruggs with criminal contempt, saying that Scruggs "willfully violated" a preliminary injunction ordering Scruggs to turn over all documents secretly copied by two whistleblowers who allege that State Farm Insurance Co. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
It’s also [...] [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:07 am
The Federal Circuit did affirm the district court’s finding of DJ jurisdiction over SAP’s DJ complaint and one of two patents in Microsoft’s DJ complaint where DataTern, in a prior litigation against these plaintiffs’ customers, prepared claim charts specifically detailing the elements of infringement based on documentation provided by SAP and Microsoft. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:27 pm
“ExxonMobil Argues Co-Defendant’s Settlement Barred Claims That Yielded $725M Benzene Verdict; The company asserted in a recent post-trial brief that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover against ExxonMobil at all because they had already been compensated by another defendant for their injuries”: Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer has this report. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:24 pm
“Judicial Notice (06.09.24): After Affirmative Action; Important opinions from Judge Kevin Newsom, the start of the Hunter Biden trial, a plaintiffs’ firm’s big payday, and the latest group hire by Paul Hastings. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court’s Ruling Makes Venue Challenges Harder; Daniel Cummins, managing partner of Cummins Law, called the ruling, ‘another victory for the plaintiff bar at the appellate court level in Pennsylvania. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Plaintiff's counsel argued that the verdict was inconsistent and requested a mistrial. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Progressive obtained a medical expert to review the Plaintiff’s MRIs. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:41 am
What’s more, the plaintiff felt as if she could not refuse to participate in the sexually explicit culture, given it seemed necessary for her to advance as a member of the team. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that a trial court abused its discretion in denying attorney’s fees to a prevailing plaintiff despite the plaintiff’s failure to recover an award which exceeded the pre-trial settlement offers. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
The case was again before the 11th Circuit, this time on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Rehearing En Banc. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:59 pm
In response to the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendants claimed Title 7 Chapter 743 Section 4103-A of the Maine Revised Statutes provides the defendant’s immunity from the plaintiff’s lawsuit. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
They claim "Section 5000A's individual mandate exceeded Congress's enumerated powers by forcing Individual Plaintiffs to maintain ACA-compliant health insurance coverage. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:58 am
Not so shockingly, the Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 8:15 am
" The three conditions set forth by the court are: 1. that the advice was incorrect, 2. that it was foreseeable that the plaintiff would rely on the advice, and 3. that the plaintiff detrimentally relied on the advice. [read post]
