Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 5781 - 5800 of 6,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The decision was also met with some criticism, see for example the critical annotation of R. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The city's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (g) For purposes of this section, "notice" may be provided by one of the following methods:    (1) Written notice. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Dans le cas où celle-ci aurait été considérée comme recevable, elle devait néanmoins être utilisée avec prudence, notamment en raison du lien temporel ténu qui existait entre les faits générateurs de l’infraction et l’intention spécifique ayant été démontrée au moyen d’une preuve constituée des mois après… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm by Paul Jacobson
The general rule was set out in the case of Edelstein v Edelstein (1952 3 SA 1 A) by the then-Appellate Division (now the Supreme Court of Appeal). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
Una cosa quedó clara: en los sistemas totalitarios y/o autoritarios, las leyes son la justificación para imponer la voluntad del régimen con un viso de legalidad, y hasta con pretensiones democráticas, mientras se alejan cada vez más las libertades y los verdaderos derechos. [read post]