Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
For as much as I wholeheartedly agree with Justice Stevens’s contention that the possibility of a lifetime of exile from the United States is perhaps the most serious collateral consequence imaginable, the fact remains that it is still a federal issue which is entirely separate from state-based criminal systems. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
The Supreme Court issued an opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:16 am
(In the 1977 decision in Marks v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
The case, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
Kentucky, there are only three cases undecided from the Supreme Court’s October sitting: United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court today released the decision in Shady Grove Orthopedics v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:31 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:19 am
Today the Supreme Court released its opinion in Shady Grove Orthopedic v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
Justice Stevens provided the moment last week during argument in Magwood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:35 am
In Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:13 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
Dunleavy v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:27 am
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Even as the Court was moving towards its decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:03 am
And Justice John Paul Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States ex. rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:48 am
(Justice Stevens asked that question of counsel for respondents, and Justice Breyer pushed on it a bit; CJ Roberts confirmed that at least U.S. investors in ADRs would be able to sue. [read post]