Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 6,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 10:40 am
This is consistent with the quote I highlighted in my initial post,“Comparative law is an ‘ecole de vérité’ which extends and enriches the supply of solutions and offers the scholar of critical capacity the opportunity of finding the ‘better solution’ for his time and place. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:51 am
By James KachmarIn Magic Kitchen LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Tobacco, the country's dominant seller of smokeless tobacco products. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:38 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
New Process Steel, LP v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
V. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
The judge sided with Moody's and S&P, who said they were not liable under the Securities Act of 1933 as either underwriters or sellers. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
§ 1.263(a)-4(b)(1)(v) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
Now that the book is out and destined to appear on the best-seller list, we're pleased that HarperCollins proposed settling this case as is, thus avoiding lengthy litigation for both sides. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm
As soon as the book is sold, the former ceases to be the property of the author (whom we can still consider here as the seller) and passes exclusively to the buyer, since it cannot have more than one lord and master. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:58 am
” DOL regulations define “sales for resale” as those in which “the seller knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the goods or services will be resold, whether in their original form, or in an altered form, or as part, component, or ingredient of another article. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:26 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
For example, in Patoni et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
When the seller isn’t going anywhere, and nobody else is likely to buy the property, then you can wait. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
However, case law including American Home Assurance Co. v Nausch, 71 AD3d 550 [1st Dept], recognizes that in some circumstances rescission may have the same effect as subjecting a party to damages for which contribution is allowed, or when the court awards damages where rescission is impossible or impracticable. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:56 am
So I would expect that Spotify will show up at the Copyright Royalty Board for Phonorecords V and insist on a safe harbor to enshrine stream discrimination into the Rube Goldberg streaming mechanical royalty rates. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Perfect price discrimination is only theoretically possible since the seller must know each buyer’s reservation price (the maximum they will pay) and individualize an offer to them at that price, thus not leaving any potential revenues uncaptured. [read post]
