Search for: "State v House" Results 5781 - 5800 of 28,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2021, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Several states deemed houses of worship as non-essential, and subjected them to stringent attendance requirements. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
The first, a case involving the Army's prohibition on the use of doctors [and others] on court-martial panels in AR 27-10, was predicted by our house psychic, Grover the Magnificent, here:United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:50 am
New London, Connecticut Mayor Daryl Finizio recently signed an agreement authorizing the construction a “memorial park” on the former site of Susette Kelo’s “little pink house,” one of the fifteen residential properties condemned by the city as part of a failed development project that led to the Supreme Court’s controversial decision upholding the takings in Kelo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 10:23 am by Arkady Itkin
As one way of advancing the express purpose of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to provide effective remedies for discrimination at the workplace, a special venue provision allows plaintiffs to file a lawsuit “in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked… [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm by Abbe Gluck
  For a bill of this magnitude, not getting the score before the vote was highly unorthodox .In King v. [read post]