Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 27,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 12:28 pm
NorthStar Towers, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 7:06 am
The Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested him on charges of violating Title 18 United States Code, Section 113(7) (assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction; assault resulting in a substantial bodily injury to a spouse or intimate partner). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
Carlos Santaló Goris, Researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg, offers a summary and an analysis of the CJEU Case C-555/18, K.H.K. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
Jurisdiction of Italian courts With regard to the point concerning alleged lack of jurisdiction of Italian courts, the court noted that the claimant was enforcing two Italian trade marks, so that the applicable jurisdiction rule would be that in Article 120(1) of the Italian Industrial Property Code (in line with what is stated in Article 7(2) of the Brussels I Regulation recast, as interpreted by the CJEU in eDate and Wintersteiger), which sets forth the competence of… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:21 pm
The policies enacted by the College of Physicians and Surgeons were upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
Buehrle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
Buehrle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
Buehrle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
At workThe judgmentThe Court recalled that freedom of expression also applies in the context of private employment relations (Heinisch v Germany, No 28274/08) and that the State has a positive obligation to ensure that a fair balance is struck between the competing interest of the individual and of the community as a whole. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
Several pre-selected opinions (Loving v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 7:15 pm
Additional Resources: Williams v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Radiance Capital Receivables Fourteen, LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
As Hill J in Aldi Stores Ltd Partnership v Frito-Lay Trading Co GmbH [2001] FCA 1874, [30] stated: In most, if not all cases, the question whether there has been use as a trade mark will be determined by an objective examination of the use in the context in which it appears.His Honour, in considering whether consumers would perceive the name Delphine as a badge of origin, stated: … the context or setting in which consumers viewed the EDMs [electronic direct mail]… [read post]
