Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 7,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Given that the State government officials sued -- the Governor, the Attorney General, and the State Registrar -- do not themselves administer the issuing of marriage licenses, one has to question whether there was even federal jurisdiction for Judge Walker to proceed in the first instance -- especially since those officials declined to defend the validity of Proposition 8. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
The Court cited with approval the Court of Chancery's decision in Pershing Square, LP v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:06 pm
Woodward Governor Co., 2004 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
The State was dismissed as a party, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the employee, and the governor declined to appeal. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:58 pm
No such appeal will be pursued by the governor or other state officers, it is now clear. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:56 am
But, you say, Justice Recktenwald was head of a state agency and his resume shows he can handle running the state Judiciary, a qualification Judge Leonard's resume lacks. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
The reporting threshold of V&T § 605 was left unchanged at $1,000. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Diamond v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am
State Department. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm
In Magana v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm
"But the governor and attorney general favor marriage equality. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:33 pm
Not Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
