Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 5781 - 5800 of 157,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
The assessment of damages is subject to the “ceiling” on damages in defamation cases – which the the Judge suggests is now £256,000 ([26]) – although he noted that it was recently stated to be £230-240,000 in Al-Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB). [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 10:33 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Although the SCOTUS definitively ruled on the issue in the Obergefell v Hodges decision, the struggle continues.In the wake of Obergefell -cloaking marital equality with constitutional Due Process protections- a crop of state laws have been proposed collaterally challenging the High Court's ruling. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Executive Power Under Dames & Moore v Regan appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Quinney College of Law) has posted Reproductive Justice at Work: Employment Law After Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
She declined, essentially admitting that no additional facts could be alleged that might state her claims under the ATA or state law. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:22 am by sally
Regina (HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616; [2011] WLR (D) 183 “The question of who was a head of state such as to attract state immunity was a matter for the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and not for the court. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Indian family law has long been a site of tension about the precise scope of the State's authority over the family. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:49 am by Nico Jacobellis
Hobbs on the State of Nature;The import of Corfield v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:09 am
In the last of three opinions on the merits, the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for a state to bar all damage lawsuits brought under federal civil rights law against prison officers or guards, allowing instead only a claim against the state itself in a special claims court. [read post]