Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 9,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
Although Merpel wonders why the offers were not also made under Part 36, the Judge nevertheless decided that the refusal of the offers by ONI was not "highly unreasonable" (as is the test under see White Book CPR 44.3.12, F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) v Barthelemy [2012] EWCA Civ 843 at [70] (citing Kiam v MGM), Astex Therapeutics v AstraZeneca [2018] EWCA Civ 2444 at [61]-[78]). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:46 am
Van Buren, 940 F. 3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019), pet. for cert. granted Van Buren v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Durex) v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm
The BCCA granted the appeal and ordered a new trial. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:58 pm
State v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:26 am
Junger v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
Ct. 2783 (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
In Fred Perry (Holdings) Ltd v Brands Plaza Trading Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 224 (Lords Justices Maurice Kay, Jackson and Lewison) the Court of Appeal for England and Wales provided some more than useful guidance on the application of one of the Civil Procedure Rules -- CPR 3.9, which deals with relief from the striking out of a claim and, indeed, other sanctions). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
The trial court in Somerset County granted Summary Judgment to the defendants, and Kwiatkowski appealed. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:52 am
Microsoft v. i4i Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft v. i4i. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am
Another Supreme Court decision, the ruling in April in Schuette v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
Additional Resources: GEICO v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
The power the Fourteenth Amendment grants to Congress is broad. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
§ 1396a(a)(23), but grant states broad authority to exclude providers for violating state or federal requirements, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Trump, Stone v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
The Court used the basic two-part analysis for ineffective assistance claims that was developed in Strickland v. [read post]
