Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 5781 - 5800 of 14,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
—the largest provider of voting equipment systems in the United States—has agreed to settle an antitrust complaint filed by the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Attorney Theodore Ronca
    With the closing of Sect 15-8(d) many claim units abandoned regular searches for prior injuries. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
”   James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Peter Shane
Commissioner, the court held that special trial judges of the United States Tax Court were officers, not employees. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, the case of an Iowa man who sold heroin to another individual, who then died. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
But it doesn’t at all consider other cases, such as United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am by Sean Cornely
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
On direct appeal, Riley argued that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney failed to move for a directed verdict of acquittal at the close of the State's case-in-chief. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Jeremy K. Davis
Although some scholars may disagree, Hague V and Hague XIII generally reflect CIL binding on all states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm by Wells Bennett
  It sought judicial permission to obtain, by means of pen registers and trap and trace devices, vast swaths of internet metadata within the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
  He then appealed, arguing that inobtaining the incriminating images from his computer, the police violated his rights under the 4th Amendment. . . .The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, `The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . . [read post]