Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 10,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:20 am
It was not about quotas v. merit. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:34 am
United States this morning and is hearing/is about to hear Weyhrauch v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
United States(1955). [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:20 am
In recent years,Congress has shown little reluctance to legislate in areas oftraditional state concern. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm
Last week, EFF, ACLU, and ACLU of Minnesota filed an amicus brief in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
On April 3, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued the first federal court decision on this issue in Noble v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm
But the EO’s provisions either don’t help, or introduce new and even more dangerous problems.Section 4(c) says, “The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) shall consider taking action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, pursuant to section 45 of title 15, United States Code. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 11:40 am
In the case at hand, State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:32 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
“If you are a U.S. citizen or a resident alien of the United States and you live abroad, you are taxed on your worldwide income. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 2:03 pm
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
The Estate of Luis Enrique Acevedo Muro, deceased v. [read post]
