Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 5781 - 5800 of 9,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
”  She added that “the fact is” that he “was an active and exceedingly dangerous enemy of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Jan Baran
Once the Court granted probable jurisdiction in McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
In yesterday’s big campaign finance case, McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am by Rick St. Hilaire
With these words, Judge Robert Gettleman ended the Northern District of Illinois case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
United States, the First Amendment broadly protects political expression in order to “assure [the] unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
 Those sources ranged from Jean Jacques Rousseau’s An Inquiry Into the Nature of the Social Contract (1791) to James Wilson’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States of America (1792) to precise page citations to Robert Post’s forthcoming book Citizens Divided: Campaign Financed Reform and the Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
” The Court also heavily relied on campaign finance cases decided in the last few years, such as Citizens United v FEC and Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v Bennett. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia:  In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The decision was not as sweeping as the Court’s ruling four years ago, removing all restrictions on what corporations and labor unions can spend of their own money in federal campaigns (Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 3:07 pm
State University, School of Law and International Affairs) Paper: Secular Liberalism, the Faith Communities State, and the Political Consequences of an Unbalanced Privileging of Religion for Multi-Religious States POWERPOINT HERE. [read post]