Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 12,159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm
If the state’s antilapse statute applies, it will direct the passing of the disclaimed interest. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Jaime is quite involved in this field, having contributed to last week's New York State Bar Association Online Market on the subject. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:16 pm
A brief waiting period is a standard part of the dispute resolution procedures in hospital policies, in model medical society policies, and in state laws. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
In Plantagenet Alliance Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] EWHC 1662 (QB), a fascinating judgment, the court explored Richard’s lineage in some considerable detail. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
In a recent Order issued by Senior Visiting Judge John Braxton in the case of O'Malley v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
Noting that the trial plaintiffs “have been waiting since the George W. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
See, e.g., Park ’N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
Still waiting on the Facebook threats case, Elonis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Moseley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Moseley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Moseley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:58 pm
She waited 22 years for today. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
A 1994 California case, Jefferson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The CJEU accordingly set aside the corresponding part of the General Court's judgment and remit the action to it -- so let's wait and see what the Court's final assessment will be, especially in regard to its appreciation of the dominant MAGNET element. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
Savings provision.Distilled, the code stipulates that a defendant must wait 2 years to seal and information related to qualifying misdemeanors/charges (those not on the list above). [read post]
