Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5801 - 5820 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
Do you have a favorite Supreme Court case? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:29 am by Kent Berk
The Arizona Supreme Court was called upon to answer the question of whether “’the recording of an assignment of deed of trust [is] required prior to the filing of a notice of trustee’s sale under A.R.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:15 am by Katherine Getty
[JURIST] Judge Clark Waddoups of the US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] said Tuesday that he would delay his ruling [order, PDF] on Utah's immigration law [HB 497, PDF] until the US Supreme Court rules on the similar Arizona Immigration Law. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Arizona, when a prisoner is questioned in private about events occurring outside the prison – is not clearly established by Supreme Court precedent; the Court divided on whether the inmate was in fact “in custody” for Miranda purposes. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:55 am by Matthew Kolken
District Court Judge Clark Waddoup has delayed issuing a decision on the constitutionality of Utah's immigration law until after the Supreme Court reaches a decision on Arizona's immigration law. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:48 am by Matthew Kolken
District Court Judge Clark Waddoup has delayed issuing a decision on the constitutionality of Utah's immigration law until after the Supreme Court reaches a decision on Arizona's immigration law. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am by Susan Brenner
The court began its analysis of the first issue by explaining that while “Arizona statutes do not define” the term “public record”, the Arizona Supreme Court provided a definition of the term in Griffis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Howes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
For instance, yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 (with the three -- penned by Justice Ginsburg and joined by Justices Breyer and Sotmayor -- joining in a partial concurrence and partial dissent) that no Miranda warnings are required to a prison inmate brought to a prison interrogaton room without his request, to be interrogated by police about allegations or pre-incarceration crime, where the inmate was told he was not required to stay in the interrogation room. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm by lawmrh
Today, we interpret timeworn supreme court law in light of subsequent supreme court law to acknowledge that the special value of “man’s best friend” should be protected. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:21 pm by Indian Legal Program
Supreme Court will be coming together to discuss their experiences in this history-making symposium. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:06 am by Bill Raftery
Legislative anger of state supreme court decisions is nothing new, nor is the practice of “punishing” the judiciary as a whole for the decisions of that court. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:32 am by Kali Borkoski
Arizona, when a prisoner is questioned in private about events occurring outside the prison – is not clearly established by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
It examined the Arizona Constitution and the role the state’s Supreme Court has played in shaping it. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
In 1976, Judge Miner was elected New York State Supreme Court Justice for the Third Judicial Department. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:32 pm
"Arizona Supreme Court to take up Mesa tattoo parlor case": The East Valley Tribune contains this article today. [read post]