Search for: "Blood v. Blood"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 7,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 1:08 pm
Blood or Breath Tests She blew a .17 breath alcohol test on the EC/IR II. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:56 am
In Chris Medina v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
” In David Scott Detrich v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Rather, the issue faced by these patents is the law of nature exception considered in LabCorp v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court answered that question definitively in the 1982 case, Pyler v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
In Godfrey v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:39 pm
On August 9, 2010, in the case of State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:55 pm
Continuing a line of cases that generally allow for the recovery of medical benefits where a worker is exposed to blood and other body fluids, yet where there is no actual proof of harm, a Kentucky court recently awarded $700 in medical benefits to a health care worker who was splattered in the face and eye with blood and saline while flushing a patient's I.V. line [Kentucky Employers Safety Assoc., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:24 pm
(v) The person has a concentration of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) in the person’s urine of at least ten nanograms of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) per milliliter of the person’s urine or has a concentration of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) in the person’s whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least ten nanograms of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) per milliliter of the person’s whole blood… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
However, the state, a state agency, or a political subdivision of the state may not be held liable for any person who operates a motor vehicle, an aircraft, water craft, or vessel who was operating it with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or more. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
However, the state, a state agency, or a political subdivision of the state may not be held liable for any person who operates a motor vehicle, an aircraft, water craft, or vessel who was operating it with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or more. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:34 am
However, blood cultures are often not performed and in most cases the blood stream is not infected. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:53 pm
Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
