Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 21,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 6:10 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:24 am
In the matter of Berkman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
In Quanta v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
A decision of the Court of Appeal that was not cited in Westminster was Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2003] EWHC 2971 (QB). [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
§ 1981, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Werdegar's body language suggested she agreed. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:40 am
A 1987 New York Court of Appeals decision, CPC International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 10:02 am
The judgment of the High Court in National Crime Agency v Mrs A [2018] EWHC 2534 3 is the first public example of enforcers’ application for, and judicial examination of, a UWO. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:42 am
In that sense, the substantial dimension involves necessarily the protection of human rights because the latter represents a limit to the democratic governments (Gelman v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:26 am
Crimes are offenses against the social order, against the body politic. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
No, I will be wearing overt body armour, so the police can see it. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:07 am
In Jihad v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:57 am
V. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
” This is the case even if the new “final determination” confirms the original administrative decision [see Raykowski v NYC DOT, 259 A.D.2d 367]. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:26 pm
Jensen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract: This article adds to the growing body of scholarship addressing the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (SFFA) that effectively ended race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions as we know it. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:28 am
" Slip op. at 16 (quoting Kaskel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:56 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:12 pm
The Court of Appeals has held that "[a] defendant may be convicted of depraved indifference murder when but a single person is endangered in only a few rare circumstances" (People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:18 am
Google, Inc. v. [read post]
