Search for: "C. M. v. State" Results 5801 - 5820 of 6,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
” 2 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, p. 9 (M. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
Time said that “Picard is considered the superstar of SIP[C] trustees, having handled the largest cases SIPC has managed”. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
“[C]ourts have recognized ‘changed circumstances’ [may] warrant modification. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
" The material presented includes the following [The General Index of Topics and samples from the text are set out below for your review]: General Index of Topics Table of Cases IntroductionAn outline of issues and concerns relevant toSituations involving Sections 207-a and 207-c of theGeneral Municipal LawGeneral Outline Of Cases And Related MaterialsConcerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a,Section 207-c and related lawsThe Full Text of Selected Opinions Selected… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
I’m also surprised that it was not argued that possession pursuant to a notice to quit violates Art. 8, following McCann and Cosic. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
But in a surprise move Tuesday, attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies, who opposed each other in Bush v. [read post]