Search for: "California Department of Justice" Results 5801 - 5820 of 9,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Allison Tussey
Arman Nshanian, 38, Corona, California, a former deputy of the Los Angeles County, California, Sheriff’s Department has been sentenced in federal court for his role in an $11 million mortgage fraud scheme. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:22 am by Allison Tussey
Nguyen is scheduled to be arraigned in Department C-57, Central Justice Center, Santa Ana. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For the non-ABA-accredited law schools, many of which are in California, the placement is far worse. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am by Catherine Fisk
California State Bar, for example, the Court upheld compulsory payment of bar dues by California lawyers. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:47 pm
” What about employers who receive reports from fingerprint databases, such as the FBI or the Department of Justice, that are not generally accessible by the public? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
California, 572 U.S. __ (2014) (anonymous 911 call sufficiently justified stop of vehicle). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
Hobby Lobby, the Court held – in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito – that (at least as applied to closely held corporations) the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:36 pm by Stefan Passantino
Not to be outdone by a sister regulator, the Justice Department has now announced that Federico R. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Amy Howe
Hobby Lobby, the Court held – in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito – that (at least as applied to closely held corporations) the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Omnicare, Take One: Receiving Kickbacks from a Drug Manufacturer The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) published the press release referenced above in February 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am by WIMS
<> Draft Science Advisory Board Report On Environmental Justice - Draft (6/27/2014) SAB Review of the EPA's Draft Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis. . . [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
The week began with the Department of Justice’s release, under a Second Circuit court ruling, of a redacted version of an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo that outlined the government’s justification for the targeted killing of U.S. citizens. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am by SHG
In describing Posner’s challenge to the puzzle, Will Baude refers to Justice Scalia’s concurrence in California v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
The Washington Post indicates that the House’s proposed Email Privacy Act now has the support of 220 cosponsors and the Justice Department. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:02 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Peter MacKay says controversial Mother’s and Father’s Day emails written by female staffer Ontario’s eldercare laws under review as dementia rates riseJustin Bieber sued for allegedly hitting California pedestrian with Ferrari  Contract on toilet paper slammed by Saskatchewan Law Society - Saskatchewan - CBC NewsFederal Justice department to slash $52.2M in legal services work for governments Winnipeg father admits to stealing children from their… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:31 pm
But as I pointed out in my original post, arguments presented to the Supreme Court – especially in important constitutional cases – are generally approved by high-ranking officials in the Justice Department, the White House, or both. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:22 am
While initial litigation positions in a federal case may often be decided by relatively low-ranking officials, arguments advanced in the Supreme Court are usually approved by high-level lawyers in the Justice Department, the White House, or both. [read post]