Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 5801 - 5820 of 26,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
  The Claimant then brought a judicial review of the Defendant’s decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
  I'm guessing, though, that what bothers her most -- and frankly what's really been bothering me most (hence Part II) -- is the sale's treatment of tort claimants, both present and future, and Judge Gonzalez's cursory justification for such treatment. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The defendants appealed – the claimants lawyers argued he shouldn’t just have won on the facts, but he should have won on the law of section 1 as well. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:58 am by Ana Popovich
The CRS also denied Claimant 5’s award claim “because Claimant 5 did not provide information that led to the success of the Covered Action. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:45 am by Nita Farahany
” It’s quite unusual to deny a motion for preliminary approval. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Here, Claimant presented evidence indicating that her domestic partner has ‘sons,' not just the special needs son attending college, and that Claimant has been an ‘integral part of the raising of [those] sons.' Thus, although Claimant cannot be legally married to her domestic partner, I would consider Claimant's family to be a real family and apply the… [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
Varriale held that the value of future workers'compensation benefits for a claimant with a nonschedule permanent partial disability is speculative, that the present value of these benefits cannot be ascertained at the time claimant recovers damages in a third-party action, and that claimant is not entitled to an apportionment of attorney's fees based on such future benefits. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:11 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum
And the $5 million restitution order is problematic for a number of reasons: All claimants get restitution, even though Deloitte found that 96% of ACE’s calls were unobjectionable. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
Dec. 21, 2007) was claimant’s right to “(1) [the] adjuster's claims notes made after [claimant’s] worker's compensation case was filed … up to the filing of this case, and (2) correspondence and e-mails exchanged between [claims administrator] and [counsel hired to defend it] within that time period pertaining to the decision to terminate [claimant’s]… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:40 am by brettb
  Nevertheless, it will prove damaging to Feinberg’s goal of getting as many claimants as possible to settle with the fund and keeping them out of litigation. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an interesting variant of SPAC-related litigation, a claimant has filed a post-merger SPAC-related class action lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the former directors of a SPAC and against the SPAC’s sponsor, in which the claimant alleges the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the pre-merger SPAC shareholders. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Nicola Waghorn
This was not something personal between the employee and the customer; he was ordering the Claimant to keep away from his employer’s premises and in doing so was purporting to act in furtherance of his employer’s business. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:03 am by Mike Scarcella
Lawyers for the banks and other claimants has not responded yet in court to the Justice Department’s criticism of Robinson’s order. [read post]