Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 5801 - 5820 of 48,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
  The defendant agreed to pay defamation damages and costs to former director Eugene Hopkinson after publishing a series of statements that alleged he was responsible for a data leak and cyberattack and had deliberately attempted to harm Mensa and its membership. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
While the matter is still before the courts, an interim costs order was issued granting the lawyers representing the workers costs in the amount of $353,790.88. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
While the matter is still before the courts, an interim costs order was issued granting the lawyers representing the workers costs in the amount of $353,790.88. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 7:01 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Dunphy recently released a decision in TSCC 2204 v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:38 am by RHP
Persistent symptoms typically included flashbacks, fear of re-injury, mood disorders, body-image changes, sleep disturbances, and anxiety. [3]Peters, V. et. al. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
Oh, and as a parting note, Richard Davidoff (as ‘nominee director’ of the resident’s management company opposing this FTT RTM application) had rule 13 costs awarded against him (or rather, alas, the RMC) for unreasonable conduct of the matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
In my recent post on the Malkiewicz v UK application, I noted two ideas for reducing exorbitant cost of defamation proceedings. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am by KLG PDF Import
Nature of Case: recovery of attorney costs incurred in prior suit Electronic Data Involved: legal invoices Keywords: legal invoices, implicit waiver Identified State Rule(s): ORS 40.225(2) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 41(a)(1) […] [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 10:48 pm by GWS Law
Significant costs, and much valuable court time, is taken up re-arguing identical points of principle in costs litigation due to the absence of a binding authority. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]