Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 6,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 1:26 pm
With respect to the second issue on the size of the punitive damages award, the Court reiterated the standards articulated by the United States Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:26 pm
With respect to the second issue on the size of the punitive damages award, the Court reiterated the standards articulated by the United States Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
On Monday, November 30, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Renico v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
The Second Circuit decided Young v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 One example shows the case of Fagan v Amerisourcebergen Corp. et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
The development of a unified Second Amendment jurisprudence is of particularly practical benefit in light of the relatively nascent state of the jurisprudence due to the confusion sown by United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Shelnutt's trial began, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
Kronk's ex-wife (and a Chief in the United States Coast Guard), who states (1) he was interested in fanta [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
On the present facts, like in Prasad, it is hard to imagine that Enterprise would have given consent in the circumstances. [38] The trend in our jurisprudence tends to be more restrictive than the broad policy approach that is taken in some United States jurisdictions and in some degrees by the Alberta courts. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:32 pm
This result the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled recently in Longaberger Company v Kolt, No 08-4432 (November 16, 2009), was appropriate "equitable relief. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell,… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:07 am
And in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States … If you follow typical Popehat reader demographics, you're an American between the ages of twenty-five and forty, and have at least a bachelor's degree. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
Heads of State and Government are now directly involved in climate change discussions to a degree previously unimaginable even a few short years ago. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
