Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 15,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
For the period from April 2012 to August 2012, damages were assessed at five per cent, which was discounted to 2.5 per cent, giving a figure of £101. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:54 am
Ga. 2012); Hogue v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:06 pm
Co. of N.Y., 19 NY3d 704, 708 [2012]; see Sosenko v Allstate Ins. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 10:43 pm
Maybe Super's objections to an Article V convention are well-taken. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am
The latest in the Brummer v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:08 am
The latest in the Brummer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
This is because average consumers do not usually presume the origin of products based on their shape or packaging in the absence of any graphic or textual elements, and it may therefore be more difficult to establish distinctive character for a pattern or a three-dimensional mark than for a word or figurative mark.More recent case law, such as Alkim v EUIPO (R 2037/2023-4), which concerned the registrability of daisy-shaped dough for pizza and pasta dishes, also illustrates that… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm
The V-MOB significantly enhances the opportunity for rapid rescue of overboard personnel. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
(L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2010] RPC 1 at [41]). [read post]
