Search for: "Friday v. Friday" Results 5801 - 5820 of 12,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
  The particulars can be found at the link above, but the basics are as follows: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. 1 Hour Total Participatory MCLE Credits [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:03 pm by Erin Miller
Today the Court asked the parties in Kiyemba v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:20 pm
Today thirty-one states, led by Texas, filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the respondent in the historic Second Amendment case of D.C. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:06 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, October 20, 2017 Editor's Note: Brad S. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Chadwick directed appellant to meet with his assigned parole agent, Todd Cregar, on Friday, May 26, 2006. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 55059 (D CO, April 21, 2014), a Colorado federal district court found no merit in an inmate's challenge to his conviction in a habeas proceeding complaining that his court appointed counsel would only meet with him between Friday sunset and Saturday sunset, the Sabbath for petitioner.In Merrick v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 46666, Feb. 13, 2013), and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to participate in Friday group prayer without signing the prison's form declaring he is a Muslim.In Handy v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 163632, Oct. 24, 2013), and dismissed a Jewish inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to use the prison chapel for Friday evening services and instead was required to use space in the security office.In McCray v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:57 am by Steve Minor
In its decisions issued on Friday, the Virginia Supreme Court dealt with the timeliness of a prisoner's collateral attack on his conviction based on involving prosecutorial misconduct in the failure to disclose exculpatory evidence (Hicks v. [read post]