Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 5801 - 5820 of 104,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the government from censoring speech pursuant to vague standards that grant enforcement officials unbridled discretion.154. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
” New ground 5F (back to mandatory): Grant of tenancy was in pursuance of LA’s duty under s.193 Housing Act 1996 (the ‘suitable accommodation’ full homelessness duty) and LA has told landlord accommodation no longer required under that duty, and the notice expires no more than 12 months after that notification. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v]  They also suggest that the breadth of the “associated person” definition might mean that employees/consultants/advisers of a subsidiary in a non-UK jurisdiction, are regarded as “associated persons” of the UK parent company. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:00 am
”In this case, however, since the court impermissibly bypassed a formal hearing process, and precipitously granted relief in the mother’s favor, the AD2 concluded that the matter needed to be "remitted" -- sent back -- for a new determination.There was no mothering there ....# # #DECISIONMatter of B. v E. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Indeed, in only one Delaware case, Akorn v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
South Bethlehem Associates, LP v Zoning Hearing Board of Bethlehem Township, 2023 WL 3471359 (PA 5/16/2023) [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
The United States Forest Service granted a timber permit for doing just that way up in the Idaho panhandle -- that strip of land way up north near Canada. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]