Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 8,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Judge W. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Robert W. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
In 2009, President Barack Obama reinforced immunities granted to INTERPOL by President Reagan and endorsed by President George W. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Dogan: patent in particular tends to come in tension w/TM only in product configuration trade dress. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The opponent, in the statement of grounds of appeal, contended that the subject-matter of claim 1 was not inventive in view of I2 and C5. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
There is strong language in other cases, like Coty, about what TM is and isn’t supposed to do w/r/t mere reproduction. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
If we talk about dividing patent law into rules/tech sectors, we could also talk about boundaries w/in copyright law or w/in trade dress (packaging/design)—who benefits from moving up and down that scale in making divisions—which industries? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:41 pm
Fiduciary duties arise as a matter of law in certain formal relationships, including attorney-client, partnership, and trustee relationships. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
When construing an insurance policy, “[w]e must strive to effectuate the policy as the written expression of the parties’ intent. [read post]
Shoulda Woulda? Alberta Court of Appeal Considers the Mental Element of the Tort of Civil Conspiracy
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am
The case is also interesting for the absence of any reference to the recent Ontario Court of Appeal jurisprudence on the matter, perhaps signifying the development of distinct Western-Canadian jurisprudence on the subjection of economic torts. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:06 pm
But I hadn’t fully understood that in Hayden’s version of the game, the object seems to be all unrelated to, say, scoring a touchdown, but is rather more about getting chalk on one’s cleats as a matter of first principles. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:45 am
Thurman W. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Further, the court reasoned that even if the “written recommendation” prerequisite was necessary, it was met, in that it was “evident” that the parties would have rejected any explicit recommendation because they had failed to reach an agreement at the informal conference, so that instead “[t]he recommendation following the informal conference * * * was for the matter to ‘be referred’” for a formal ALJ hearing “‘at… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Further, the court reasoned that even if the “written recommendation” prerequisite was necessary, it was met, in that it was “evident” that the parties would have rejected any explicit recommendation because they had failed to reach an agreement at the informal conference, so that instead “[t]he recommendation following the informal conference * * * was for the matter to ‘be referred’” for a formal ALJ hearing “‘at the request of both parties.’” [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In Remix Without Romance, UC Davis professor of law Thomas W. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Appellate remedies matter. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
Gov’t Code Ann. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Almeling & Darin W. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:33 am
You can't get interest like that anywhere.I know we are happy to arrest people and let people know we will find them no matter how long it takes. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:33 am
You can't get interest like that anywhere.I know we are happy to arrest people and let people know we will find them no matter how long it takes. [read post]
