Search for: "In Interest of Jones" Results 5801 - 5820 of 7,328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:35 pm
* Once again, First Amendment crusader Marc Randazza -- who successfully represented Above the Law in Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm by David Zaring
The Starr investigation was one interesting constitutional crisis. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Jones Docket: 09-357 Issue: When a state court has reviewed the merits of a petitioner’s federal claim for plain error, is the decision of a federal court of appeals in a habeas corpus action that there was procedural default of that claim contrary to the decisions of this Court? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:39 am by AdamSmith1776
   Bear in mind that interviewing would still occur in August, but that firms would be forbidden from "signalling" their interest in any individual student for nearly the next six months until OKOD. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 9:14 pm by Adam Thierer
  Because I believe you can find more—and more interesting—forms of culture today than at any point in human civilization. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 1:44 am by Ann Althouse
Why would it just be skeptics who would be interested in evidence of serious flaws in the science? [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am by Michael Scutt
The article about whether employees should be allowed to blog by their employers is one that interests me, for obvious reasons. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:19 am by f4lblog-author-b3
Although a subsequent claim made against Ms Kaney failed on grounds of immunity, Mr Justice Blake has ruled that Mr Jones can apply to the Supreme Court as the issue of immunity in this instance is one that is of particular public interest. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:10 pm
Jones recently testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee (Video | Transcript). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:10 pm
Jones recently testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee (Video | Transcript). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Debra Saunders, a SF Chronicle columnist, contends that Walker may have the appearance of a conflict of interest. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
Indeed it seems right to emphasis that the publication of the redacted paragraphs would not and could not, of itself, do the slightest damage to the public interest. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  First, he pointed out that the decision allows unions and corporations to fund “magic words” advertisements – which, unlike advocacy ads that might encourage voters to “call candidate Jones about issue x,” encourage listeners to “vote for candidate Jones. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:54 pm by doug
This is despite the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, etc., being seriously down for the month of January. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:44 am by Teri Rodriguez
We've found that every Texas lawyer has an interesting story. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
  However, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports that Alan Gura, who will argue the case on March 2, is not interested in sharing the podium, or his argument time, with the NRA. [read post]