Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 5801 - 5820 of 40,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 7:20 am by Nathan Dorn
There is one large miniature on the verso of the second folio, which depicts “l’arbre de douleur” or “the tree of suffering,” an image that Bovet touches upon in his work. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Natasha Brunstein
American Telephone & Telegraph in 1994 and FDA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 9:10 pm by Sophia Tang
The adoption of virtual proceedings for cases with large value was even rarer. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm by familoo
That same decision also prompted amendment of s97(2) Children Act 1989 in apr 2004 so that the term ‘publication’ in the context of the identification of children as subjects of proceedings was relaxed slightly so as to bite only on publication ‘to the public or a section of the public at large’. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 6:48 am by Michael C. Dorf
Relying on the votes of five Justices in the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in the first Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 5:44 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is a 2021 opinion from the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division is styled, Nayeb Family, LP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the plaintiff's or defendant's past cases have been pseudonymous, that information may be largely unavailable (at least until you ask for information about the party's past cases in discovery, and the party accurately answers). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
In a welcome departure from COVID-era norms, they were actually both physically present for the event.The article is the fruit of a LOT of research, including careful reading of a large number of Supreme Court cases on the dormant commerce clause (DCC), in both the tax and regulatory realms. [read post]