Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 8:33 am
De Boulle Diamond & Jewelry, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
On July 22, 2016, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in City of Birmingham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 10:03 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:29 pm
Burris himself will see no relief.Several prior cases stood in the way of this decision, most notably United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 10:51 am
Frompovicz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:41 am
We should reject the labels “soft on crime” and “tough on crime,” and instead be smart on crime and soft on taxpayers. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm
Winans v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:15 pm
(Although I can personally confirm that LV lawyers can be charming individuals with fully functioning senses of humor, and probably even love puppies, protecting a famous trademark can be an unforgiving task, especially when the label's designer is a bit of a free spirit.)$300,000 legal bill or not, Pamela would do it all again. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:36 am
Our legislature unequivocally has expressed a policy of deference to the federal scheme in the area of drug labeling, and we can ascertain no reason not to extend that policy to civil cases raising misbranding claims.White v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Last month, in Riegel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The judgment in Case C-244/06 Dynamic Medien Vertriebs GmbH v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
See AstraZeneca LP v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm
Following on the heels of Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:14 am
[iv] [v] One of these chemicals, 4-phenylcyclohexene (4-PC), is mainly responsible for the odour of new carpets. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:45 pm
Municipal Court and See v. [read post]
