Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 156,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 12:50 pm
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Burt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:50 pm
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Burt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
ShareOn Friday the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” The post Executive Power Under Dames & Moore v Regan appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
NCAA and New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
In Castellanos v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:44 am
However, while New Jersey employment law gives strong protection to employees, a recent published appellate decision in the case of McVey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:09 am
Earlier today, the US Supreme Court issued it's highly anticipated 7 to 2 decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 5:23 pm
Supreme Court in advance of oral arguments in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:05 am
In Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
” Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
” Sackett v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
Taskila v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:14 am
The opinion is styled, Jose Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 4:30 am
Indian family law has long been a site of tension about the precise scope of the State's authority over the family. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
The post <i>Return Mail v. [read post]
