Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm
” That’s based on the New Jersey Superior Court’s finding that “As long as computers, dedicated to handling election matters, are connected to the Internet, the safety and security of our voting systems are in jeopardy,” in the case of Gusciora v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:31 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court jump started this issue in January through its work in Hill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Aff. (1875-1876) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Lai ... [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:34 am
Loving v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Merial).I wish that the paper had a more explicit conclusion—even if the authors do not feel comfortable claiming that genetic diagnostic patents do preempt development and are thus unpatentable subject matter, they could at least lay out what factors still need to be examined to decide whether this is true—but I still think the paper does a nice job of highlighting the preemption concern and thinking about factors that might be relevant in investigating preemption. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v EEOC, a church and school (Hosanna-Tabor) employed the plaintiff as a “called” teacher and a commissioned minister. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:13 am
Chism v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
For instance, in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
ak Çali V. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
California Classification Laws: In addition to staying on the right side of the FTC, companies should also be careful to stay on the right side of the recent California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
I’m referring to Town of Greece v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Based on the totality of the circumstances of the working relationship’s economic reality, the club qualified as an employer under NRS 608.011, and the dancers qualified as employees under NRS 608.010 (Terry v Sapphire/Sapphire Gentlemen’s Club, October 30, 2014, Pickering, J). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
An hour later, plaintiff was reportedly laying in the middle of the road when he was struck and dragged beneath a vehicle. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:38 am
Part (v) of that section of the bill allows professors to be fired for violating laws or university policies. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:28 pm
The judge here footnotes the Chew v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:14 am
The court therefore held that the superior court erred in reversing the Board’s decisions in all four appeals Forsyth County Georgia v Mommies Properties, LLC, 2021 WL 926616 (GA App. 3/11/2021) [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:24 pm
I point out that American policyholders seem to share this enthusiasm, at least judging from the questions the presiding judge in Epic v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:02 am
The case is Kooper v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
