Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 5801 - 5820 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
In his second claim, Marco alleges that the C3 and the other Defendants are vicariously liable for the infringement carried out by other parties. [read post]
15 May 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court is satisfied that it was not an attempt to hold Defendant liable under the outmoded theory that women are expected to be chaste and thus any accusation of sexual conduct lodged against a woman, irrespective of the nature of the sexual conduct, is slanderous. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:26 pm
Massachusetts Wrongful Death A person doesn’t have to have directly caused a fatality to be held liable for Massachusetts wrongful death. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:46 am by Altman & Altman
The plaintiff in the above case is suing the defendants, alleging that they failed to provide necessary instructions for use, and to warn consumers of the product’s defect. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:26 am by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Because Hutchens had allegedly solicited FCI’s customers, the court held that Interstate could be held liable for tortious interference under a “solicitation of customers” theory. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:06 pm
Canuso, 140 N.J. 43, 65 (1995), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that a residential builder, developer and broker were liable to homebuyer's for non-disclosure of off-site physical conditions known to the defendants, which were unknown to the buyer. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:36 am by Stanley D. Baum
ERISA, however, holds fiduciaries liable solely to the extent that they were acting as a fiduciary when taking the action complained of. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Section 3342 of the California Civil Code provides: “The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Steven Malman
The post A Beginner’s Guide to Medical Malpractice appeared first on MalmanLaw.com. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Steven Malman
The post A Beginner’s Guide to Medical Malpractice appeared first on MalmanLaw.com. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Steven Malman
The post A Beginner’s Guide to Medical Malpractice appeared first on MalmanLaw.com. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:32 am
The Court reasoned, a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Defendant's failure to tender a neurosurgeon, i.e., provide maintenance and cure between the First Incident and the Second Incident, aggravated Plaintiff's condition. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Bush, to defend the structure of the CFPB against a constitutional challenge in Seila Law v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 5:40 am by Lyle Roberts
In a typical securities fraud case, where the plaintiff alleges that a misrepresentation artificially inflated the company’s stock price, the defendant may be able to rebut reliance by providing evidence that there was no stock price increase as a result of the misrepresentation. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:44 am by Will Newman
”Cases like this illustrate the defenses available in negligence lawsuits.Judge, Not Jury, Decides What a Particular Word in a Contract MeansTrials may be necessary to determine whether a plaintiff is liable to a defendant when there is any ambiguity in the law or a contract. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:35 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
In these circumstances, a defendant can be left holding the bag with fewer fee-shifting options because it will not have a judgment on the merits.But as the Court found, the bad-faith finding is tantamount to such a judgment because it serves as a finding that not only was the defendant not liable, but also that the plaintiff knew from the start that it never could be. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:32 am by Eric
The court says HSI isn't contributorily liable because Rosen's takedown notice was insufficient to confer the requisite knowledge. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm by admin
Therefore, it is the defendants burden to prove that it was not negligent. [read post]