Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 11,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:45 pm
United States Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, 219 F.R.D. 93, 100 (D. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
After getting GVR’ed last year in light of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:09 am
Woods v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 6:20 am
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
Kagan complained that the United States had pointed to few sources with which to interpret the statute. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
Bodum USA, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 10:23 am
As similar cases arise in various circuits across the United States, the DOL’s response to the decision will likely be guided by whether other circuits give deference to such guidance. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:37 am
“In 2009, plaintiff filed a Chapter 13 Petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (“the Bankruptcy Court”) under Case No. 09-38537-KCF. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
United States (1994), and Edmond v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:54 pm
United States Department of Education, in which it will decide whether to uphold a set of Department of Education regulations relating to the federal Impact Aid program. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Hill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:38 pm
The case, Parent v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:47 am
In a case of first impression for the Court, it ruled in Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
But something had to be done about the United States, which is by far the largest destination of personal data from Europe. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
United States (Jan. 19): Whether, when a court is deciding whether to resentence a defendant under the First Step Act, which gives federal district courts power to resentence offenders in light of changes in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, a district court must or may consider intervening developments, or whether such developments only come into play (if at all) after courts conclude that a sentence reduction is appropriate. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Indus. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:16 am
The Ninth Circuit has compellingly articulated a more appropriate test in United States District Court v. [read post]
