Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 11,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2007, 12:45 pm
United States Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, 219 F.R.D. 93, 100 (D. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:09 am
Woods v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 6:20 am
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
Kagan complained that the United States had pointed to few sources with which to interpret the statute. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
Bodum USA, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 10:23 am
As similar cases arise in various circuits across the United States, the DOL’s response to the decision will likely be guided by whether other circuits give deference to such guidance. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:37 am
“In 2009, plaintiff filed a Chapter 13 Petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (“the Bankruptcy Court”) under Case No. 09-38537-KCF. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
United States (1994), and Edmond v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:54 pm
United States Department of Education, in which it will decide whether to uphold a set of Department of Education regulations relating to the federal Impact Aid program. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Hill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:38 pm
The case, Parent v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:47 am
In a case of first impression for the Court, it ruled in Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
But something had to be done about the United States, which is by far the largest destination of personal data from Europe. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
United States (Jan. 19): Whether, when a court is deciding whether to resentence a defendant under the First Step Act, which gives federal district courts power to resentence offenders in light of changes in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, a district court must or may consider intervening developments, or whether such developments only come into play (if at all) after courts conclude that a sentence reduction is appropriate. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Indus. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:16 am
The Ninth Circuit has compellingly articulated a more appropriate test in United States District Court v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Lawyer says YES (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions Another case dismissing hundreds of Doe copyright defendants as improperly joined: Light Speed Media Corp. v. [read post]
