Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 39,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 6:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
The 2017 trial saw the joined claims of Illumina & Sequenom (& Ors) v Premaitha and Illumina & Sequenom v Ariosa (& Ors). [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:44 am
Barber v Actknowledge, Inc., 24 Misc 3d 1211(A) [Sup Ct, Kings County 2009, Demarest, J.]). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
It's nice to see a circuit push back a little on just how broad it can be. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:28 am
" This result - an unconditional new trial order - makes sense to me, but what's a little harder to fathom is the court's reference, without further elaboration, to Stevens v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
On the one hand, yes, it is insane to sue a pre-school for anything short of leaving little Johnny overnight in an abandoned field. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
Companies may also see an increase in class actions where there is a significant stock drop following disclosure of a cybersecurity breach—however, to date, there is little evidence to suggest the market reacts in a negative way following disclosure of a cybersecurity breach, leaving questions about whether plaintiffs could prove materiality and causation in a securities fraud case. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
These type of private prisons are a profit making machine whereby the owners are making alot of money with little concerns for the safety of the inmates. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
There is little question that Justice Ginsburg's opinion gave plaintiffs maximum latitude under that statutory language and nothing in the language or reasoning suggests an intent to cut back on a widely used practice by plaintiffs. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:19 pm
(Importantly, some of Waldron's work on political obligation was what led me down that path but little of Waldron's work on that subject figures into his review of Seidman.) [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Conover and McGaw v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
Butler v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:20 pm
Breyer made repeated efforts on Wednesday to keep open the chances that an $18 million settlement of a major copyright dispute may yet get a full hearing on its fairness in federal court, but he found little support among other members of the Supreme Court as they pondered the scope of a federal court’s power over copyright lawsuits in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
Berube v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:46 pm
US v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:00 am
In Roper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Sepulveda-Carrero v. [read post]
