Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 5801 - 5820
of 13,697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 8:12 am
Medina-Cruz, Ferraiuoli LLC NOTAS [1] 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 8:08 am
Because the opinion is so lengthy, I’m going to discuss and comment on the defamation issues in this post, and save the discussion of the insulting words claim for another day. 1. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:40 am
AOSC11-1 (January 10, 2011), MEAC Opinion 2011-017. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Perhaps as a result of this caution, much judicial humour is comparatively slight and not especially funny, as extracts in this article suggest. 1. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
This section goes into greater depth on those issues and previews coming installations n the series, which will appear on the Stanford CIS blog. 1. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Vanni and Rachel B. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
The information alleged Cayetano–Jaimes committed the offense `[o]n or about and between February 1, 2006 and February 1, 2007. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
> [14] Lynne M. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
Under Art. 25(1) the transfer of personal data can take place only if the third country ensures an adequate level of protection of such data. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
Smith, 2015 NY Slip Op 31861(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 1, 2015], decided by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
LEXIS 694, *1 (Ga. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Laurel M. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
ONE (1) 2004 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR, VIN # 5LM FU27RX4LJ28242, No. 14-0692 Set to be argued on November 4, 2015 ALICE M. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm
This might look like a significant win for Mrs B. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Circuit's June 23 decision, which held that (1) the Court of Appeals does have mandamus jurisdiction over the CMCR (and, through it, the military commissions); but (2) Nashiri had not surmounted the high bar for mandamus relief because (a) he likely has other remedies; and (b) his claims on the merits, though significant, raise questions of first impression--and are thus beyond the appropriate scope of mandamus. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Europe already provides more robust legal privacy protections than many countries, including the US; this will make those protections even stronger and advance global norms around the privacy rights of Internet users.[1] And it should surprise no one that European lawmakers, angered by the Snowden revelations and the US government’s lackadaisical response, want more control over what personal data leaves Europe and how it is protected and safeguarded. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:52 pm
But, hey, I’m biased. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The new law becomes effective January 1, 2016. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
(MERS) as nominee for M/I Financial Corp. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
To which Szubin responded, “I’m not aware of any discussions within the administration that would lead to our snapback leverage being dissipated…at any point. [read post]
