Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 6,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 7:13 am
The next day, the Justista appeared for the first time in her official capacity (along with some of the brightest superstars in the Highcourtosphere) to hear a pre-season argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:03 pm
That's the question my colleague, Shaun Martin, is asking over at his California Appellate Report blog, in connection with People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:11 am
In Warde v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
Monday was Martin Luther King day, so counsel drove to the post office herself first thing in the morning Tuesday, and sent the papers express mail for guaranteed delivery Wednesday, which is when they were due. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
(John Martin, head of the Cuyahoga County PD’s office, and pictured here preparing for his oral argument last week in State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Thus, in Sandra Kirkland v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:32 pm
- Harrisburg, PA lawyer Justin McShane on his Pennsylvania DUI Blog "Dead Peasant" Insurance Policies Are Source of Increasing Litigation - Charleston attorney Jeffrey Mehalic in his West Virginia Business Litigation Blog Shootout in Tulsa: OK v Big Chicken - Denver-based reporter Dan Flynn on Food Safety News [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
Martin, 65 P.3d 866 (Wa. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
See Martin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
Martin of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
That fits in with Martin’s argument, but also with the court’s treatment of allied offenses in State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:03 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:41 am
Martin’s Criminal Code: “Serious bodily harm must be both intended and caused for consent to be vitiated: R. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
v=ttv5dyvtF4oNow I've heard there was a secret chordThat David played, and it pleased the LordBut you don't really care for music, do you? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:25 pm
But I'll make an exception here, because (1) I read it, (2) it's terrible as a matter of both form and substance, and (3) since Tichinin and Fink win anyway, they can feel secure notwithstanding my critique by saying "That just shows that Professor Martin's a moron and doesn't know a good brief when it hits him in the face. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:14 pm
Um dos funcionários do Google que percorreu a Universidade da Pensilvânia, Martin D.F. [read post]
