Search for: "POST PROPERTIES, INC."
Results 5801 - 5820
of 9,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Hartley Construction, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 3:25 am
Examining Attorney Bibb further argued that competitors need to use the word "stacked" to describe their own wines.Applicant asserted that, although "stacked" may describe its novel packaging, it does not describe a "characteristic, function or property" of the wine. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Liggett Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 1:02 pm
And, to Volpin’s credit, the company’s principal—Harrison Krix, himself of Atlanta—has asked (on Facebook, where much of the public commentary has been posted) that people “not send Courtisan [sic] Inc or Marriott any nasty messages concerning this. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:00 am
The fact that proposals discriminating against a particular (and very large) category of patents would undermine U.S. trade policy in connection with intellectual property is presumably anything but an unintended consequence.Here's the letter: Letter: 100+ Innovative Businesses and Organizations Send Letter to Congress Objecting to "Covered Business... by innovationallianceIf you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I… [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 6:08 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Real Estate Title Question with Divided Properties; Stephanie Cutter and Jordan Mummer v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
IMB+ Records Inc. 2013 ONSC 5382 http://t.co/8X5y5upZuQ -> Philip Pullman: illegal downloading is 'moral squalor' http://t.co/2aWCK5sNej -> Search engine indexing files fair use says court in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
By Eric Goldman Craigslist Inc. v. 3Taps Inc., 2013 WL 4447520 (N.D. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 11:59 am
Courts have applied Section 230 even when they have found it problematic to do so, such as in Directory Assistants, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 9:16 am
XTO Energy Inc. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The IPKat has stumbled across a decision earlier this year from the Federal Court, Canada, in Pfizer Canada Inc. v Pharmascience Inc. 2013 FC 120, dating back to 4 February. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Government’s Circumvention of Encryption Technology http://t.co/0XtoND1kMz -> Common List of Authorities for patent and trade mark cases in Federal Court of Appeal http://t.co/dDIsgnzBOg -> Lessig Mixes it Up http://t.co/RVhRvZzXva -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-09-10: Global rules to govern Net sought by China http://t.co/l… http://t.co/dPcm8U2fHC -> Nevada District Court Finds No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Private Twitter Posts… [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:38 pm
” Meanwhile in the US, according to Android branding guidelines, the Android name is property of Google Inc. and the Robot logo is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Denver, Colorado -- Intellectual property lawyers for Steak n Shake Enterprises, Inc. and Steak n Shake, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana (collectively "Steak n Shake") sued in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that Globex Company, LLC; Springfield Downs, LLC; Christopher Baerns; Larry Baerns; Kathryn Baerns and Control, LLC, all of Colorado, are infringing the "Steak n Shake" marks, which have been registered by the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 4:53 am
” Meanwhile in the US, according to Android branding guidelines, the Android name is property of Google Inc. and the Robot logo is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions;Property Law Opinions Body: AC34427 - Howard-Arnold, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm
News, Katy Bachman/AdWeek, Food Marketing Institute] Manhattan Institute weighs in with “Trial Lawyers Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
This post is a summary of the decision. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
In Therasense, Inc. vs. [read post]
