Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 5801 - 5820 of 18,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am by Florian Mueller
Apple explained to a court that even if those challenges succeeded, the processes would take until at least mid-2017 or longer if Apple exhausts (as it will do in the case of strategic patents) all appeals -- and the only way these processes can be concluded ahead of time is if Apple wins and a patent is confirmed.Last year, not long after the first Apple v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by John Jascob
Deutsche Bank first argued that the challenged statements were merely aspirational or puffery. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
Bob Bauer challenged claims made by Alan Dershowitz about the threshold for an impeachable offense. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am by Liisa Speaker
" Weaver v Graham 450 U.S. 24, 31 (1981)A civil and regulatory law such as SORA doesn't violate the Ex Post Facto clause unless the challenger can clearly and convincingly show that the civil remedy is really a criminal penalty. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
I can live with losing my law license in the course of representing unpopular people and challenging judges who diminish the luster of the robe. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
States that permit tribal gambling tie work comp protections into those compacts, but tribes, like opt-out employers, have great latitude in defining their systems, including dispute resolution processes.It comes down to culture.Dave Lundgren, a Washington-based attorney who specializes in tribal law, told WorkCompCentral, “They know their people and they know their customs, where non-Indian administrative structures do not. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It is not difficult to guess what part of the second paragraph of the opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 331 is an appeal judgment, which arises from the challenge by two sets of parents to continuing reporting restriction orders (RROs) that were made during separate proceedings about their children in relation to their end of life care. [read post]