Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 12,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:44 am
Upon petition by cxLoyalty, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court today resolved United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:16 pm
It deemed itself bound by its 1994 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
-citizen mothers outside of the United States, and those born to unmarried U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 7:29 am
Consular officers cited “reason to believe” she had willfully misrepresented a material fact (alleged unauthorized work in the United States). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:22 am
The order was issued in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:36 am
United States, there’s a strong possibility that Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s rhetoric didn’t make her new friends. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 2:36 pm
Before the judge issued that order though, Bebo brought her constitutional challenge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, seeking a declaration that the SEC’s administrative law judges lack constitutional authority to issue such orders. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Docket: 08-1341 Title: United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
As such, Truly Nolen accentuates the stakes in two arbitration-related petitions currently pending before the California Supreme Court: Iskanian v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
California’s anti-SLAPP statute provides that a complaint which arises from the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
