Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5801 - 5820 of 178,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 7:12 am by The Docket Navigator
"After [plaintiff's parent's] acquisition of [plaintiff], [plaintiff] operations were transferred to [its parent]. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:19 pm
In this case involving native burials, the plaintiffs allege... ...that trenching work [for Kawaiaha'o Church's new $17.5 million multipurpose center] disturbed the graves of [Plaintiff Abigail Kawananakoa's] ancestors â€â [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:07 am by The Docket Navigator
This Court would have to break far more new ground, however, to disregard its conclusion that there is a substantial relationship between [defense counsel's prior representation of plaintiff in opposing two patent applications] and this action, and not disqualify [defense counsel] under the facts here. . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
”...But Plaintiffs’ reliance on these other racist or anti-religious views or policies is unavailing because Plaintiffs do not connect them with Section 4’s adoption. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:13 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
” The new individual plaintiffs are both alleged to be women who own small businesses. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:50 am by Stanley D. Baum
The Bank chose to incorporate by reference the Bank's SEC filings into the Plan's Summary Plan Description (the "SPD"). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Frances G. Zacher
Plaintiffs certainly have high expectations for what McDonald's should "know" in civil litigation these days. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The plaintiff in this case invokes the cat's paw in pursuing a racial discrimination case. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiffs had asserted that the ban violates the 2nd Amendment, the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, and the First Amendment's religion clauses. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Appeal focused on admission of Plaintiffs patient’s medical records and of Defendant’s medical expert testimony. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiffs law firm’s February 4, 2019 press release about the verdict can be found here. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:54 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiffs’ claim for tortious interference with a business relationship based on an email written by defendant abated upon defendant’s death. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Under Lexmark, “a plaintiff suing under [the false advertising provision of the Lanham Act] ordinarily must show economic or reputational injury flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant’s advertising,” which is usually accomplished by showing that the defendant’s “deception of consumers cause[d] them to withhold trade from the plaintiff. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:02 am
Barr indicated that his review of plaintiff's records led him to include that "the only way to properly evaluated the plaintiff's condition is to conduct a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation.... [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm by Throneberry Law Group
s motion for summary judgement, the court ruled that the company had not met the legal standards to show that its products could not have caused the plaintiffs injury. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
The plaintiffs also argued that the CGL Policy’s Auto Exclusion did not apply because the insured’s conduct in crossing the highway was not a “use” of the semi. [read post]