Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 5801 - 5820 of 85,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am by Stewart Baker
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am by Peter J. Sluka
Spatola curiously did not argue that Ayvis’ Estate lacked standing to seek dissolution and the Court did not raise the issue on its own. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
The applicant recalled the slogan “Vorsprung durchTechnik” (advantage through technology) at issue in the decision Audi v OHIM C-398/08and argued that “Sustainability through Quality” should be considered similarly distinctive, it being irrelevant that individual words such as “sustainability” or “quality” are not in themselves eligible for protection: it is the whole impression of the mark applied for that is decisive. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Giorgio Luceri
Therefore, the Board correctly found that there was a high degree of conceptual similarity.LinkThe applicant argued that the reputation of Google is merely for search engine services. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although these proposals have been around for some time, recent contentious election cycles, debate over hot-button issues, including the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” It conditionally criminalized aiding or abetting most abortions if the United States Supreme Court later overruled Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
and mens rea (did Twitter have a culpable mental state?) [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
{The events giving rise to these two lawsuits occurred in the years preceding the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]