Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5801 - 5820
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 4:31 am
" Sections 12100(p), 12401(c), 12402(b). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Decentralizes authorship: the work becomes what’s important b/c it spreads, decontextualized. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
CommentAs stated, this is going to be a key referral for the (further) construction – and de facto unification (!) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
OLIVER, d/b/a CRAZY TONY’S RESTAURANT v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
B. [read post]
Scott Rothstein Arrested, Trial Set For 1/11/2010 And Filings In USA v. Rothstein, 0:09-cr-60331-JIC
1 Dec 2009, 6:53 pm
Mass Mutual v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:54 am
In Passmore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Mark B. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:57 am
WhenU.com, Inc., 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005), which held that no Lanham Act "use", and, thus, no actionable Lanham Act claim, exists for the use of a trademark in a keyword or metatag, where (a) the defendant does not place the trademark on any product, good or service, (b) it is not used in any way that would indicate source of origin, and (c) where defendant's use of plaintiff's trademark is strictly internal and not communicated to the… [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:14 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
—b/c the TM bar sensed a risk of loss, of limitation. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Drennan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 6:10 pm
But if an Ontario case, Leibel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
For instance, the court could have ruled that a map is unconstitutional when the mapmakers (a) intended to maximize and lock in one party’s seats for a full decade, (b) actually succeeded in doing so, and (c) could offer no neutral explanation for the degree of partisan advantage observed in the map. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
Order No. 645 states that current Arctic drilling provides 81 percent of Russia’s gas and 17 percent of its oil. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In June 2022, Parliament adopted a set of amendments, which, inter alia, allow Canada’s executive branch to seize or restrain property that is owned, held, or controlled by (a) a foreign State, (b) any person in that foreign State, or (3) a national of that foreign State who does not ordinarily result in Canada. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Simpkins v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:40 pm
Barr and Ovalles v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
(In United States v. [read post]
