Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 7,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
For example, In United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 8:03 am
From Henderson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
For it was not until the 1890 case of Hans v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
… States should mandate risk-limiting audits [of a statistically valid random sample of the ballots] prior to the certification of election results. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
In the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am
In another recent case, Public Impact, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
See Swett v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am
And, ironically, without that power Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm
She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]
