Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 5801 - 5820 of 16,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 4:06 am by Andres
The balancing act can be seen in more detail in a series of decisions by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which start with Delfi v Estonia, and culminates with MTE v Hungary. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Indeed, the high court explicitly rejected the notion that every minor inaccuracy reported in violation of FCRA will cause a concrete harm, giving the example of an incorrectly reported zip code. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Like parental consent laws in other states, the Alabama law stipulated that in this situation, the minor would be able to go to a judge to get approval for her abortion. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:49 pm by Bill Otis
 The answer is no, for reasons explained by Justice Alito in his four-member dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Danielle Citron, Helen Norton
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing summary judgment against his discrimination claims, the appeals court noted evidence that the locations to which he sought transfer offered better career opportunities and would remove him from the supervision of an individual he claimed was biased against minorities (Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 10:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Ohio (1961), applying the exclusionary rule to the states; Gideon v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:01 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Neglect of a minor Samantha Chenoweth, appellant, was convicted at a bench trial by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of neglect of a minor and was thereafter sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am by Tyler Green
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
For example, the sheriff claimed the employee submitted false work hours while attending the state law enforcement academy. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
Rick Esenberg is the founder, president and general counsel of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]