Search for: "State v. Price" Results 5801 - 5820 of 13,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 4:09 am by Susan Brenner
  At trial, the prosecution claimed Guerrero had been “voiding and discounting customer orders without the customers' knowledge, and retaining the difference between the full prices paid by the customers and the discounted prices reflected on [his] server reports. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
Paul Bernal’s blog had a number of posts on the subject, including “Surveillance and Austerity” and “DRIP: normalising the surveillance state”. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by The Berniard Law Firm
The House Bill's goal is to act as a deterrent to state residents, that if they choose to continually jeopardize themselves and others on the roadways, they will have to pay the price, both in time and in money. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
The House Bill's goal is to act as a deterrent to state residents, that if they choose to continually jeopardize themselves and others on the roadways, they will have to pay the price, both in time and in money. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 21-page opinion in Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 21-page opinion in Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:54 am
  Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:59 am
The agent lacked that authority, the court ruled.The November 11 decision in Gunn v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
IIROC also stated that a review of the current erroneous and unreasonable price policies and procedures is currently underway and a notice will be published for comment when completed. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am by David Bernstein
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:46 am by Steven Koprince
 The solicitation stated that award would be made on a best value basis, considering past performance, technical merit, and price. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 10:38 am by Robert Kreisman
  The panel then stated that the unfairness analysis primarily relied on six factors laid out in another case, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]