Search for: "Story v. State" Results 5801 - 5820 of 17,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
In the same year, you made it onto the board of the state defender association. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  For example, here is how one internal CIA memorandum described the agency’s approved strategy for dealing with a potential revelation of its illegal mail-opening program (Church Report Book II at 148): Since no good purpose can be served by an official admission of the violation, and existing Federal statutes preclude the concoction of any legal excuse for the violation, it must be recognized that no cover story is available to any Government Agency . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
In the United     States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As Patently-O has described in several posts (here, here, here), the Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of the patent exhaustion doctrine in Impression Products v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
In the United     States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm by NCC Staff
Croix River, Wisconsin-Minnesota On March 20, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Murr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm by NCC Staff
Croix River, Wisconsin-MinnesotaOn March 20, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Murr v. [read post]