Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 5801 - 5820 of 16,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 3:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
After 88 minutes of hearing, in the high-profile civil rights case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
The new US Department of Justice antitrust leader says antitrust enforcers are too accommodating to IP implementers when in dispute with standard-essential patent owners. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:35 pm by Amy Howe
Tripp made clear that the United States “has a very strong interest in combatting state-sponsored terrorism. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Sixth Circuit: The district court should reconsider, with a strong presumption of unmasking. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitration award may be vacated by the court if it finds that arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.Finding that in Petitioner's case the arbitrator's determination was supported by evidence in the record, that nothing in the record indicates… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitration award may be vacated by the court if it finds that arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.Finding that in Petitioner's case the arbitrator's determination was supported by evidence in the record, that nothing in the record indicates… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitration award may be vacated by the court if it finds that arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.Finding that in Petitioner's case the arbitrator's determination was supported by evidence in the record, that nothing in the record indicates… [read post]